Ultrasonography is increasingly recognized as a safe, non-invasive, and dynamic imaging modality in dentistry, utilizing high-frequency sound waves to visualize soft tissues, vascular structures, and pathological lesions in real time. Its applications span diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical domains, including evaluation of salivary glands, tongue, palate, periodontal structures, periapical lesions, TMJ disorders, implant planning, and oral and maxillofacial masses. Ultrasound-guided interventions enhance precision in procedures such as cyst aspiration, nerve blocks, implant placement, and biopsies, while Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) supports bone regeneration and tissue healing. Advantages include radiation-free imaging, portability, cost-effectiveness, and excellent soft tissue differentiation, with Doppler modes enabling vascular assessment. Limitations involve operator dependence, restricted bone penetration, and limited availability of dental-specific intraoral probes. Future trends emphasize high-frequency, 3D imaging, elastography, contrast enhancement, AI integration, and workflow digitalization, positioning ultrasonography as a complementary tool alongside conventional radiography and CBCT for modern, precision-driven dental practice.
Introduction
The study investigates the concept of employee engagement and its impact on organizational performance. Employee engagement is defined as the emotional and intellectual commitment employees have toward their work and organization, which leads to higher productivity, motivation, loyalty, and alignment with organizational goals. The research emphasizes the importance of positive work culture, effective communication, leadership support, and growth opportunities in enhancing engagement.
The study aims to:
Identify factors influencing employee engagement.
Examine its effect on organizational performance.
Explore the role of leadership in promoting engagement.
The literature review highlights that engaged employees show higher creativity, resilience, and discretionary effort, and that leadership and communication significantly influence engagement levels.
A descriptive research design was employed, using surveys among 138 employees of Ucal Polymer Industries Limited. Statistical tools such as Pearson correlation and Chi-square tests were used to analyze relationships between variables like feedback satisfaction, performance-based promotion, communication, and participation in training. Results indicated no significant correlation between feedback satisfaction and promotion satisfaction, and no significant association between communication clarity and training participation, with some limitations in data reliability.
Key findings:
Majority of respondents were young (18–30 years) and male.
A significant portion (79.71%) felt insecure in their job positions.
Over half of employees were dissatisfied with performance feedback.
Suggestions:
Improve transparency in communication from leadership.
Link team-building activities to organizational objectives.
Facilitate internal career growth opportunities.
Conclusion
Ultrasound in dentistry is emerging as a safe, versatile, and dynamic imaging tool that complements traditional radiography and advanced modalities. It enables real-time, radiation-free assessment of soft tissues, lesions, and vascularity. To fully harness its potential, standardized protocols, dedicated intraoral probes, and comprehensive operator training are essential. Continued device innovation and integration with digital workflows will expand its clinical and research applications.
References
[1] Ultrasound in Dentistry; Demirturk Kocasarac, Husniye et al.; Dental Clinics, Volume 62, Issue 3, 481 – 489
[2] Karumuri SK, Rastogi T, Beeraka K, Penumatcha MR, Olepu SR. Ultrasound: A Revenant Therapeutic Modality in Dentistry. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZE08-12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18584.8190. Epub 2016 Jul 1. PMID: 27630969; PMCID: PMC5020309.
[3] Reda R, Zanza A, Cicconetti A, Bhandi S, Miccoli G, Gambarini G, Di Nardo D. Ultrasound Imaging in Dentistry: A Literature Overview. J Imaging. 2021 Nov 14;7(11):238. doi: 10.3390/jimaging7110238. PMID: 34821869; PMCID: PMC8624259.
[4] Wiklander L, Cederlund A, Kadesjö N, Näsman P, Tranaeus S, Naimi-Akbar A. Negative health effects of dental X-rays: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0323808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323808. PMID: 40440627; PMCID: PMC12122044.
[5] Meshram R, Singh A, Singh L, Sood SK, Singh A. Ultrasound imaging in dentistry: a comprehensive literature review of clinical applications. Afr J Biomed Res. 2024 Sep;27:157-162.
[6] Rodriguez Betancourt A, Samal A, Chan HL, Kripfgans OD. Overview of Ultrasound in Dentistry for Advancing Research Methodology and Patient Care Quality with Emphasis on Periodontal/Peri-implant Applications. Z Med Phys. 2023 Aug;33(3):336-386. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Mar 13. PMID: 36922293; PMCID: PMC10517409.
[7] Aldrich J.E. Basic physics of ultrasound imaging. Crit. Care Med. 2007;35: S131– S137
[8] Abu Zidan FM, Hefny AF, Corr P. Clinical ultrasound physics. J Emer. 2011; 4:501– 503
[9] White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. Salivary Gland Radiology. 2008;2:665–666
[10] Díaz L, Contador R, Albrecht H, Ibáñez M, Urrutia P, Bencze B, Toro M, Sáenz-Ravello G, Végh D. Clinical applications of ultrasound imaging in dentistry: A comprehensive literature review. Dent Rev. 2024 Jun;4(2):100086.
[11] Mago, Jyoti; Sheikh, Soheyl1; Pallagatti, Shambulingappa1; Aggarwal, Amit1. Therapeutic applications of ultrasonography in dentistry. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology 26(4):p 414-418, Oct–Dec 2014. | DOI: 10.4103/0972-1363.155689
[12] Recent advances of ultrasound imaging in dentistry – a review of the literature; Marotti, Juliana et al. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, Volume 115, Issue 6, 819 – 832
[13] Sansanwal M, Chouhan S, Bhateja S, Arora G. Ultrasonography, a non-invasive technique in dentistry. Int J Maxillofac Imaging 2019;5(3):51-3.
[14] Intraoral ultrasonography image registration for evaluation of partial edentulous ridge: A methodology and validation study. Journal of Dentistry (2024).
[15] Ultrasound identification of the cementoenamel junction and clinical correlation through ex vivo analysis. Scientific Reports (2024).
[16] Diagnostic application of intraoral ultrasonography to assess furcation involvement in mandibular first molars. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2023).
[17] Ultrasonographic evaluation of edentulous crestal bone topography: A proof-of-principle retrospective study. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology (2021).
[18] Caglayan F, Bayrakdar IS. The Intraoral Ultrasonography in Dentistry. Nigerian J Clin Prac 2018;21(2):125-33.
[19] Bains VK, Mohan R, Bains R. Application of ultrasound in periodontics: Part I. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2008 May;12(2):29-33. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.44087. PMID: 20142941; PMCID: PMC2813558.
[20] Saluja H, Sachdeva S, Singh MV. Ultrasound in periodontology and implantology [Internet]. IP Int J Periodontol Implantol. 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 14];9(3):113-122. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2024.024
[21] Renaud M, Gette M, Delpierre A, Calle S, Levassort F, Denis F, Rochefort GY. Intraoral Ultrasonography for the Exploration of Periodontal Tissues: A Technological Leap for Oral Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 24;14(13):1335. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14131335. PMID: 39001225; PMCID: PMC11240584.
[22] Rochefort GY, Denis F, Renaud M. Ultrasound Imaging: Advancing the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease. Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;13(8):349. doi: 10.3390/dj13080349. PMID: 40863052; PMCID: PMC12385332.
[23] Figueredo CA, Catunda RQ, Gibson MP, Major PW, Almeida FT. Use of ultrasound imaging for assessment of the periodontium: a systematic review. J Periodontol Res. 2023 Oct 23. doi:10.1111/jre.13194.
[24] Ugboko VI, Amole AO, Ibitoye B. Applications of ultrasonography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of the literature. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2003 Jun;32(2):119-29. PMID: 15032456.
[25] Lahari Muppalla,Lakshmi Mounika Kalluri, Lakshmi kanth Kolaparthy, Boyapati Ramanarayana DENTAL ULTRASOUND- A REDEFINED MODALITY AS DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC AID: REVIEW.Bulletin of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2024;20(4): doi: 10.58240/1829006X-2024.4-43
[26] Hayashi T. Application of ultrasonography in dentistry. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2012; 48:5–13
[27] Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L. Ultrasonography of the temporomandibular joint: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:1229–1236.
[28] Bonsall, L., Ziccardi, V. B., & Bornstein, M. M. (2015). Diagnostic ultrasound in dentistry: A review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 44(6), 20140300. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140300
[29] Ghorayeb, S. R., Braga, F. J., & Pinto, T. M. (2021). Ultrasonography in Dentistry: Review of the Literature. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 47(7), 1754-1765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.015
[30] Joshi C, Saleem A, Khare V, Saifi D, Naren S, Saifi AM. Comparison and Evaluation of Efficacy of Soft Splint, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation and Ultrasound in Temporomandibular Disorders. AMEI\'s Current Trends in Diagnosis & Treatment. 2021 Dec 8;5(2):71-9.